TALENTED ACTRESS, TERRIBLE ROLES: AN OPEN LETTER TO TONI COLLETTE


I love bad movies. Even if they suck from scene 1, I’m in for the ride. Case in point – I’m watching Basic Instinct 2 right now. On purpose. Even my TiVO seemed to twitch and cast a disparaging digital eye in my direction when I chose to record it.

That being said, I’ve subjected myself to a few stinkers this week. Unfortunately, both co-starred Toni Collette, one of my favorite actresses.

Below are brief reviews of the two movies I could barely sit through, followed by an open letter to the very talented Ms. Collette.

THE DEAD GIRL
Look at this cast: Josh Brolin, Rose Byrne, Toni Collette, Bruce Davison, James Franco, Marcia Gay Harden, Mary Beth Hurt, Piper Laurie, Brittany Murphy, Giovanni Ribisi, Mary Steenburgen, Kerry Washington. And yet…the film itself is so disappointing. I can see why each of these actors signed on; the concept was interesting and dark, but the execution was slow and bland.

THE NIGHT LISTENER
I find it hard to believe that the same man who wrote Tales of the City also penned the novel and adapted the screenplay for this clunker (Armistead Maupin). Let’s be honest,  Robin Williams hasn’t been good (or appeared in) a good movie since Good Will Hunting. And that was ten years ago. Anyway, this film is a very slow and poor cousin to most psychological thrillers, and fails miserably in almost all categories (acting, pacing, dialogue, cinematography).

So…

Dear Toni Collette,

I am a big fan. You have amazing range, capable of transforming before our eyes from one film to the next. You’ve made great choices. Until recently.

Aside from a few questionable career moves (Shaft & Changing Lanes), you seem to choose your roles quite wisely. You were brilliant in Muriel’s Wedding, and The Sixth Sense really put you on everyone’s radar (that Best Supporting Actress nod was well-deserved). Your brief appearance in The Hours was very impactful and memorable, About a Boy was great, and Connie and Carla was a pretty decent little comedy. You even made In Her Shoes tolerable, outshining the overrated Cameron Diaz by a mile. And you could do no wrong in Little Miss Sunshine.

So I have to ask…what were you thinking when you signed on to The Dead Girl and The Night Listener? Seriously, both were pretty unwatchable. I’m sure that on paper, both films seemed appealing, with good casts and intriguing scripts. But did you really feel, at any point during filming, that either of these scripts would translate well on the big screen and/or be commercially appealing?

Here’s the good news – I will continue to see every movie you’re in. I know there is an Academy Award in your future. And you’re not alone in the Great Actresses Who’ve Made Crappy Movies category; 14-time Oscar nominee Meryl Streep made She-Devil, for crying out loud.  

- Jo

Read More

YOUR DVD COLLECTION


I own a very large library of movies on DVD; I love collecting my favorite films and watching them again with commentary from actors, directors and writers. And of course I keep an alphabetized list of DVDs I own with me at all times (on my phone), which comes in handy when I peruse that $7.50 section in Target.

I tend to loan out stacks of DVDs at a time, and right now several of my friends are enjoying them while on maternity leave. What is my point? See the photo below.

This kit was a gift from my good friend ARG (those are just her initals, but it’s fun to pronounce with a pirate accent and one eye closed). Anyway,it’s the perfect present for someone like me. You know, the anal-retentive librarian type who archives just about anything.

If you also have a large DVD collection and let people borrow from it, you should get a Personal Library Kit for Cinephiles too. You can purchase one here: HGTV

Read More

CHEESE & WHINE: A REVIEW OF TRANSFORMERS


Ok, I admit it. I went to see Transformers last night. Against my better judgment and only after some wine.

Knowing that Steven Spielberg was the Executive Producer of this movie gave me hope as I settled in to watch it last night. False hope, as it turned out.

Let me preface this review by stating that I do enjoy blockbusters and am a huge fan of comic adaptations. And I have seen/been entertained by most of Michael Bay’s films. My favorite was The Island, his last effort and the least popular among the many hits (Bad Boys, The Rock).

I will start with the very few positive points that I walked away with after seeing Transformers. Shia LaBeouf was surprisingly good. He has certainly earned the amount of hype that has all but dubbed him the It Boy of 07. I liked him in Constantine and I, Robot, but was unsure about his ability to carry such an action-packed film. Of course now he’s filming Indiana Jones 4 right now, so he’s well on his way. And the special effects were pretty good…but not jaw-dropping or groundbreaking. Frankly, I was more impressed with The Matrix Reloaded, and that was filmed five years ago.

Overall, Transformers was absolutely formulaic and cheesy (to the point where I was predicting what the characters were about to say and do with great accuracy). I don’t have high expectations for dialogue when it comes to action/adventure films, but this might take the cake and win Worst Script of the Year (which is quite a shame considering that the two screenwriters are Alias alum and are also co-writing J.J. Abrams’ new Star Trek film). Additionally (and I know some filmmakers feel this is a necessary evil with regard to target audience and demographic), there were far too many unnecessary and gratuitous slow-motion shots of female characters. While there is plenty of eye-candy for the ladies (Josh Duhamel and Tyrese Gibson), we certainly don’t see them rolling around the desert sand in their boxer briefs while battling the metallic scorpion.

And honestly, at various points during the movie, I found myself thinking “there’s his John Woo shot” or “that’s straight out of Superman.” From the stereotypical hot-girl-with-jerk-boyfriend-ignores-geek-until-he-saves-her (the wooden Megan Fox) to the funny-sidekick-friend-who-helps-save-the-day (Anthony Anderson, making the best of his brief yet scene-stealing role), I was alternating between covering and rolling my eyes.

You know what would have made Transformers an entirely different and better film? If the Transformers didn’t speak. I know – that would have royally pissed off the dedicated loyalists who have loved them since ’84 (just as making Bumblebee a Camaro rather than a Beetle had the fanboys up in arms).  But the opening narration, speech and delivery from all Autobots and Decepticons was painful.  Look, I like many guilty-pleasure movies and can take schmaltz and cheese in moderation (I was an extra for one season on The Mighty Morphin Power Rangers back in 1994 for crying out loud). But Transformers was dreadful and had me watching the clock and the doors for my escape from the opening sequence.

Sigh. Next!

Read More

CLOVERFIELD UPDATE; TRAILER & NEWS (UPDATED)


The official trailer for Cloverfield is now available online:
http://www.apple.com/trailers/paramount/11808/

Producer J.J. Abrams sent a note to Ain’t It Cool News stating that the Ethan Haas websites are not officially associated with the movie (and it has been since confirmed that those two sites are for an unrelated video game):
http://www.aintitcool.com/node/33261

Don’t bother visiting TheParasite.com – it was just someone’s idea to draw traffic to their game site and is in no way related to the film. Lame!

Read More

BUZZ! HYPE! MYSTERY! J.J. ABRAMS PLANTS THE SEEDS FOR ‘CLOVERFIELD’


Cloverfield
, a.k.a. The Untitled J.J. Abrams Project, has fanboys and dedicated Lost followers abuzz.
Long story short, there is a brief trailer for Cloverfield playing before The Transformers (which I have no desire to see).  I watched it on YouTube a few days ago, but it was promptly yanked by Paramount (who, in an interesting twist, have denied the actual existence of this film). My initial impression of the trailer? The Blair Witch Project meets War of the Worlds. Sweet.

Rumor has it that the creative team behind this film are familiar names to those of us who have watched every J.J. Abrams show; Cloverfield was written by Drew Godard (Alias &  Lost), is being directed by Matt Reeves (Felicity) and produced by Bad Robot (Abrams’ company).

According to IMDB, this is a “monster movie that is shot using home video cameras from the point of view of people who are experiencing an attack on New York City,” and that the actual monster is called The Parasite. And in a not so surprising reveal, Cloverfield is in fact a fake name (due to relentless spoilers and aggressive bloggers, Abrams has been known to code name his projects).

Is it mere coincidence that J.J. Abrams is also in pre-production for the next Star Trek movie, also to debut in 2008? I seriously doubt that they are one and the same, but you never know with The Hatch Master. Can you imagine a better way to reinvigorate that franchise than a sci-fi thriller featuring the Enterprise crew battling a mysterious monster in NYC? Hey, anything is better than watching Captain Kirk time traveling in San Francisco and rescuing humpback whales (1986′s Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home).

A few vague Cloverfield-related sites have popped up online, adding to the intrigue:

The official film site
http://www.1-18-08.com

The following two blogs lead you to an extraterrestrial DaVinci Code-like device in front of a bleak future cityscape. On one, you click on the symbols that pop up from the glowing orb, mimicking the order in which they appear. That delivers you a blurry video diary, presumably from a character in the movie. On the other, you move the symbols around the circumference and over the top of the orb with your mouse for the next clue (click on the far right star in the sky for a peek at the code’s alphabet). I haven’t ‘solved’ either site yet, but I’ll get to them eventually.

http://www.ethanhaaswasright.com

http://ethanhaaswaswrong.blogspot.com

I don’t know who Ethan Haas is, and I don’t care. I’m game. Literally.

Read More